Megalodon
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 9, 2021
- 2,319
- 4,316
Kwenye Science kila kitu kinakuwa supported na data au statistical significance, kinyume na hapo hiyo inakuwa ni IMANI au personal faith.
Maneno kama ukikojoa mkojo wa povu, wewe una FIGO, kiuno kikizidi 40, una heart disease, ulaji wa sukari unaua figo , ulaji wa wali unaua mwili, unywaji wa Juice ni hatari kwa moyo , na aina nyingine ya maneno yake.
Huu sio ushauri wa kisayansi bali ni intimidation to the public and it is high time now The Ministry of Health should stop him immediately na Wizara ibebe jukumu lake la kuelimisha jamii kupitia taasisi za Chakula na Lishe ikiwa ni pamoja na kutoa ushauri Rasmi jinsi ya kuepuka non communicable disease.
Janabi yupo ki political fame na hayupo kitabibu, na kwenye Sayansi ni UNETHICAL kuja na conclusions kama za Janabi.
The Flaminggham Heart Study began in 1948 in USA, Massachusetts ambapo ilienda kuangalia factors zinazochangia magonjwa ya moyo ( Cardiovascular disease), it was a cohort study ambayo ilichukua miaka zaidi ya 15 kuja na conclusion kuwa kuna uwezekano wa kupata heart disease kama unavuta snaa sigara, unene, kutofanya mazoezi etc. Na hii haikuwa ni confirmation, it was just a risk factor and not CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP!
Kuna watu wamekuwa wakinywa, wakivuta na wakila nyama nyingi kwenye maisha yao yote hadi wanazeeka hawajui presha ni nini, figo ni nini or anything like that .
Ever wondered why kuanzia miaka ya 2000 ndio matatizo ya figo na moyo yameongeza sana?
kuna watu waliokuwa walevi na wavutaji kama wazee wetu? And all of them died due to old age peacefully, no pressure , no figo no blah blah na walikuwa wakila sna wali , Sukar, nyama etc etc
Matatizo mengi ya figo TZ yanasababishwa na matumizi ya dawa kiholela, na dawa nyingi TZ ni counterfeit, matumizi ya mitishamba bila ya kuwa na standard maalumu, ulaji wa vyakula vya kusindika etc etc na clearly hii ni risk factor sio CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP.
Unawaambia watanzania wale kipande kimoja cha muogo kwa siku, that is very unethical and intimidation. The body needs sugar ya kutosha, fats za kutosha, proteins za kutosha , vitamins and mineral to function healthy and properly.
Why miaka ya sasa tatizo la figo na heart limekuwa ni kubwa? Hapa we need answers and causal relationship na sio intimidation!
Kama mwanasayansi unapotuambia ukikojoa mkojo wa povu hilo ni figo, unatakiwa kuja na findings ambazo zimekuwa checked scientifically and generalized, any statement unayotoa ni lazima iwe supported na data and proven scientifically .
Huwezi kutumia reference za watu wachache wanaokuja Hosp ambao tayari wanashida zao then ukaanza ku generalize kwa watu wengine publicly bila ya kuwa na sufficient , consistency , coherent and experimental data, you can’t generalize kwa patients wanaokuja who are already sick ….,. That is not science and impractical.
It is unethical for such a prof kuanza kutoa statement kama hizo ambazo hazina data support, ina raise query na questions uhalali wa huo u Prof ! . Hatuwezi kuwa madaktari wa social media na mitandao kwa mitaji ya KISIASA.Ni misleading na intimidation kwenye jamii unnecessarily.
Kama kweli unywaji wa pombe unapanua moyo …… demonstrate it , shows us ….data zipo wapi …..and what about the people who drink day and night… na hawana anything like that …. Tuna conclude vipi?
Ndio maana tunasema science has to be respected ili kuzuia personal experience kutawala.
Badala ya GOVT kufund research za kimkakati ambazo zinaweza kutuletea majibu na causal relationship as to why tatizo la figo na moyo limekuwa kubwa kuanzia miaka ya 2000, tunaenda kuspend billions of money kununua V8 za wakuu wa wilaya. Shame!
Maneno kama ukikojoa mkojo wa povu, wewe una FIGO, kiuno kikizidi 40, una heart disease, ulaji wa sukari unaua figo , ulaji wa wali unaua mwili, unywaji wa Juice ni hatari kwa moyo , na aina nyingine ya maneno yake.
Huu sio ushauri wa kisayansi bali ni intimidation to the public and it is high time now The Ministry of Health should stop him immediately na Wizara ibebe jukumu lake la kuelimisha jamii kupitia taasisi za Chakula na Lishe ikiwa ni pamoja na kutoa ushauri Rasmi jinsi ya kuepuka non communicable disease.
Janabi yupo ki political fame na hayupo kitabibu, na kwenye Sayansi ni UNETHICAL kuja na conclusions kama za Janabi.
The Flaminggham Heart Study began in 1948 in USA, Massachusetts ambapo ilienda kuangalia factors zinazochangia magonjwa ya moyo ( Cardiovascular disease), it was a cohort study ambayo ilichukua miaka zaidi ya 15 kuja na conclusion kuwa kuna uwezekano wa kupata heart disease kama unavuta snaa sigara, unene, kutofanya mazoezi etc. Na hii haikuwa ni confirmation, it was just a risk factor and not CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP!
Kuna watu wamekuwa wakinywa, wakivuta na wakila nyama nyingi kwenye maisha yao yote hadi wanazeeka hawajui presha ni nini, figo ni nini or anything like that .
Ever wondered why kuanzia miaka ya 2000 ndio matatizo ya figo na moyo yameongeza sana?
kuna watu waliokuwa walevi na wavutaji kama wazee wetu? And all of them died due to old age peacefully, no pressure , no figo no blah blah na walikuwa wakila sna wali , Sukar, nyama etc etc
Matatizo mengi ya figo TZ yanasababishwa na matumizi ya dawa kiholela, na dawa nyingi TZ ni counterfeit, matumizi ya mitishamba bila ya kuwa na standard maalumu, ulaji wa vyakula vya kusindika etc etc na clearly hii ni risk factor sio CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP.
Unawaambia watanzania wale kipande kimoja cha muogo kwa siku, that is very unethical and intimidation. The body needs sugar ya kutosha, fats za kutosha, proteins za kutosha , vitamins and mineral to function healthy and properly.
Why miaka ya sasa tatizo la figo na heart limekuwa ni kubwa? Hapa we need answers and causal relationship na sio intimidation!
Kama mwanasayansi unapotuambia ukikojoa mkojo wa povu hilo ni figo, unatakiwa kuja na findings ambazo zimekuwa checked scientifically and generalized, any statement unayotoa ni lazima iwe supported na data and proven scientifically .
Huwezi kutumia reference za watu wachache wanaokuja Hosp ambao tayari wanashida zao then ukaanza ku generalize kwa watu wengine publicly bila ya kuwa na sufficient , consistency , coherent and experimental data, you can’t generalize kwa patients wanaokuja who are already sick ….,. That is not science and impractical.
It is unethical for such a prof kuanza kutoa statement kama hizo ambazo hazina data support, ina raise query na questions uhalali wa huo u Prof ! . Hatuwezi kuwa madaktari wa social media na mitandao kwa mitaji ya KISIASA.Ni misleading na intimidation kwenye jamii unnecessarily.
Kama kweli unywaji wa pombe unapanua moyo …… demonstrate it , shows us ….data zipo wapi …..and what about the people who drink day and night… na hawana anything like that …. Tuna conclude vipi?
Ndio maana tunasema science has to be respected ili kuzuia personal experience kutawala.
Badala ya GOVT kufund research za kimkakati ambazo zinaweza kutuletea majibu na causal relationship as to why tatizo la figo na moyo limekuwa kubwa kuanzia miaka ya 2000, tunaenda kuspend billions of money kununua V8 za wakuu wa wilaya. Shame!
anyway good thread! Bt next time jitahidi kupangilia mada vzur usiwe paragraph hii unatoka nje ya mada kabsa paragraph ijayo unarudi
