What an awkward analogy!
U.S.A fought a conventional warfare against a legitimate Taliban government.
Kenya and its K.D.F is fighting an asymmetrical warfare against The Al-shabab who employs unconventional means of warfare.
The result of the Kenyan holy Crusade would be very obvious.
Casualties would be minimal but too embarrassing for the Kenyan authorities.
That's the Modus Eperandi of all the guerrilla groups in the world.
I hear your government threats to withdraw the K.D.F from Somalia. (which would spare the lives of innocent Kenyans dying for the Corrupt Gikuyu Oligarchs living in their Mansions in Nairobi)
If you really new anything about mordan warfare, you would know that fighting an unconventional force is much difficult.
and you should also know what you are talking about.
The US is a world power that has fought bigger nations conventionally... the talibal didnt stand a chance fighting a head to head conventional war against the US. the talibal suffered a devastatind defeat against the US. they were completely dominated in the air. and the conventional bit of the war ended long time ago back in 2012 with minimum casualties.
then the taliban moved into the mountains, the sunni govt supported by US too over and the shiats and other militants including al-Qaeda and other disgruntled grops started an insurgency by using unconventional means to achieve there goals... thats when the casualties started comming......
US had to patrol the streets and thats when they started getting ambushed, supply trucks were raided, infact, by 2009, most deaths on the coalition forces were as a result of IEDs set on the roadsides or inside buildings ... and when the troops came out of thier humvees to search for ieds on the road, they were sniped...... and thats when the US also changed tactics, instead of large regular forces, they instead deployed special forces (by their definition they use unconventional means) , they conducted raids and ambushes on the enemy, and thats how the pushed thwm back, when the taliban or other groups heard special forces were comming, they would scater and disapeare, the SF were ruthless... but civilian casualties also increased.
anyway.... what am saying is there is no diffence btn the war the US was fighting after 2012 and the war amisom is fighting, the only diffence is the scale.
the militants in afghan had unlimited supply of cash (I mean if they could even aford to fund other terrorist groups in forwgn countries) but they were equally matched by the resources the us deployed...attavh hellos, air support, med evac, satelite, attach drones...
in 2007, alshabaab was estimated to be ariund 11, 000.
by the end of 2012 they were estimated around 7, 000... remember btn that period,
an estimated 3, 000 foregn fighters from EA had joined their ranks
.. KDF alone had killed 3, 000+ militants, there is Uganda, ethiopia, burundi, sieraleaone. and Somalia itself...
alshabaab have tried every trick in the book to defeat amisom. when kdf first set foit there, alshabaab used to fight for territory and defend there positions, when it dint works, they tried ambushing, when it dint work, they turned their focus on soft targets... thats when bombings started in kenya against civilian targets,... they have been changing tactics eversince..
the US with all the military power in the world has spent 13 years in m.east..... look what has happened.... they killed 1 snake, 2 heads grew (alqaeda, taliban) they killed the two heads, and now four heads gwowing from all sides..... Iraq forcea are now fighting ISIS... infact I would say afghanistan and Iraq are in worse state than whe the us first set foot there... the violenve is much worse... so pls, spare us the BS, KDF have done much better to restore peace in somalia
former AS bases have been restored back to schools, people play fotbal on the streets,go to swim on the beach something wich was forbiden..... and you hardly hear of any civilian deaths in kismayu and southern side of somalia. to me, that is something even the us failed to provide for somalia